Oct 2, 2008

Flipside/Flipside

It has been an uplifting experience to hold a musical instrument and get meaningful sound out of it as opposed to random strains. There is so much to do in this world rather than be influenced by various thoughts and actions of others and move into a domain that is hitherto unknown. Don't get me wrong, moving into new arenas is not bad, influence of other people at various stages is to a certain extent. 
I may be speaking for myself here and many may not subscribe to my views, but asserting oneself is what its all about here; to do for yourself than for anybody else. Selfish? may be... but selflessness is for the sadhus; not for me.
There seems to be a digression when i speak of selfishness and assertiveness at the same time but looking at my situation it becomes clearer as to what i talk about. Therefore i speak/spoke of perspective (earlier post). As how perspectives tend to change the thought process of the person.
So, subscribing to someone Else's views may or may not have its fallacy (because everything is relative) but doing your own thing is much better than anything else in the world. You hold yourself responsible and credit yourself for whatever good comes your way.
The flipside is the point where you have done and gone your way and it hasn't turned out so much as you hoped for in life, then one has to turn to others and listen to that classic refrain "I told you so..."
At that exact point you want to wring the other persons neck but you turn the other cheek instead. Plain sailing to rough seas, never is anything perennial. Experience it. Don't judge it.

Sep 17, 2008

Lets all be happy

I'm wondering if i take myself too seriously...guess i need to loosen up in putting down my thoughts, there is a gamut of emotions that have deeply serrated inside me and these aren't bright shiny things, they are dark and ugly, brooding and scary...

Only positivity shall mitigate the darkness, and therefore being serious is one, and being morose is another

Sep 13, 2008

Comfortable Drudgery/ Placid Calm

the winds of change sweep away your calm
transports it to an unknown
the sands of time move unwaveringly
through the mirage of life
as you grope for reality
but it slips away from your clawing fingers
merrily...
you suppose that's the way of these shifting dunes
that they cease to remain
cease to maintain the drudgery
a drudgery that is so dear
that you covert it in your heart
and secretly delve into its happiness
mingled with fear of the prying eyes
that would take away the sweet thought forever
Your heart desires a stolid silence
a placid clam
an ephemeral peace
silently settling in on your conscious
as your subconscious rejoices 
at the return of calmness
and the comfortable drudgery

Sep 11, 2008

Khwaheesh

idahr se aati hai aandhi
udahr se toofaan
beech mein mai
ek awaara, unjaana insaan
na kudrat ka takaza
na koi ek manzil
sirf ek khwahish
mere nadaan mann ki
ki asmaa ko choo loon
badaloon se khel loon
panchiyoon ko peeche chood
hawa ke sang ho-loon
Lekin
smajhaa ke rakhna hai is mann ko
ke aandhi rukegi
lage din ek ya do
toofan tham jaayega
aur suraj dega apni roshnii
aur mera roam roam jagega
jaagega sach ki aur...

Aug 27, 2008

Who decides?

maintaining something is a pain,
i mean its so much better to throw money at a problem, it solves a lot of issues.
But then again the question of integrity creeps in into the framework of things, because fundamentally it is the will and the thought that shapes all things pure and true, anything else is just farce. Or is it?
I mean there are so many things in this world that can be done by means that are plural in their approach but there are others that dont confirm to these equations of barter.
And therefore i say that that the nature of humans plays a big role in these happenings.
The choices made, the parts played and the decisions taken. Somethimes the rulebook takes a backseat and practicality takes forefront.
Many a times these things take their course influenced by the environment that they dwell in/ take place in.
So does that mean that moral sicence is exteremely nice to be taught in text books and that it has no true purpose in life than to score better overall percentage?
Is it true that all things considered immoral may be amounting to foolishness?
Who shall be the judge of things like these;
Because judgement is influnced by perception and perception depends on perspectives,
Diffrent perspectives>perceptions>judgements>Outcomes
So who decides?