Who decides?

maintaining something is a pain,
i mean its so much better to throw money at a problem, it solves a lot of issues.
But then again the question of integrity creeps in into the framework of things, because fundamentally it is the will and the thought that shapes all things pure and true, anything else is just farce. Or is it?
I mean there are so many things in this world that can be done by means that are plural in their approach but there are others that dont confirm to these equations of barter.
And therefore i say that that the nature of humans plays a big role in these happenings.
The choices made, the parts played and the decisions taken. Somethimes the rulebook takes a backseat and practicality takes forefront.
Many a times these things take their course influenced by the environment that they dwell in/ take place in.
So does that mean that moral sicence is exteremely nice to be taught in text books and that it has no true purpose in life than to score better overall percentage?
Is it true that all things considered immoral may be amounting to foolishness?
Who shall be the judge of things like these;
Because judgement is influnced by perception and perception depends on perspectives,
Diffrent perspectives>perceptions>judgements>Outcomes
So who decides?